Google news india - Pune Crime News Part III: Joshi Abhyankar Murder Case

Pune Crime News: This murder is to scare the Brahmin community and make them leave Pune.

Bafna robbery case: Pune Crime News

November 20, 1976: On this day, there was an attempt to rob the bungalow of Yashotmatibai Bafna. The robbers were two young men.

There is a road connecting the camp to the Swargate area of Pune. It is called Shankarshet Road. Meera is the largest settlement on Shankarsheth Road.

Belongs to the housing society. In front of this society is the Trishala bungalow of Kai Kantilal Bafna. There is an open space around the bungalow.

The compound has a five-foot-high wall. On entering the bungalow, there is an entrance and a veranda-like space. The first living room after entering through the entrance

First, then the dining room, and in front of it, the kitchen. Yashomatibai Bappana, Ashabai's son Nitin, in the 'Trishala' bungalow.

Yashomatibai's sister's 8-year-old daughter, Rashmi, lives with Ashatai Jain's 8-year-old brother, Raju.

Pune Crime News, Part Five: Witness of Apology

On November 20, 1976, Farak Hakeem, a Bafnan servant, came at 1.30 p.m. to see the work in the bungalow. Yashomatibai's for some work at the bank

He went to the bank with the signature. When he came back again at half past six, Ashabai, Neetu, and Rashmi had gone out. In the house, Yashotmatibai, Raju, Pavitrabai, and

There was a difference.

At seven o'clock, when Farak left to drink tea, Mrs. Yashomati closed the door. When Farak Trisha came back to the bungalow, the gate of the bungalow opened.

Farooq Hakeem saw that. He took his bicycle to the western side of the bungalow. A man getting off a bicycle

He ran towards him with a knife in his hand and pressed his foot on Farooq's neck. Then, in fear, he shouted 'Bahenji'-Raju from behind the bungalow.

He was studying on the side verandah. Hearing Farak's voice, Raju shouted and asked, 'What happened'? That man should talk to Hakim.

Full of breath. A second man entered through the front door.

Pune Crime News, Part Five: Apologising Witness 4

According to the police report, these two people tied the hands and feet of Raju and Hakim with ropes. After that, the thieves stole the hands and feet of Yashomati Bafna.

When she tried to tie him, saying, 'I am sick; don't hurt me', he asked her for the keys to the safe.

When the woman gave the keys, one of the thieves opened the cupboard and tried to steal the money.

Finding nothing in the cupboard on the ground floor, he opened the cupboard upstairs. As nothing came to hand, he went down the stairs again.

came During this time, hearing the screams of Farooq Hakim and Raju, some people from outside came running near the bungalow. Seeing them both thieves

The criminals crossed the compound wall and spread out from the rear.

Pune Crime News, Part Five: Apologising Witness 4

The whole incident took place on November 20—20 days after the mass murder of the Joshi family. This 'Bafna' case happened in the house of Bafna.

It should be noted that no one was killed in the robbery attempt. Also, no one was seriously injured. Yashomatibai

After five months, Bafna identified Jakkal and Dilip Sutar in an identification parade at the police station after the criminals were arrested.

(Identified). It proved that the two criminals were the ones who broke into the house. It should be especially mentioned that in this crime, accused no. 3 is Shantaram Jagtap and

Accused No. 4: Both Munnawar Shahs did not participate.

No one was killed in the house of Mrs. Bafana; only two accused, Rajendra Jakkal and Dilip Sutar, tried to steal from the house of Mrs. Bafana.

had tried So the question is, was there any conspiracy among these four accused to commit any crime in this 'Bafna case'? Was there any criminal

http://www.postboxindia.com/pune-crime-news-pune-joshi-abhyankar-murder-case-part-2/

Conspiracy among the four accused persons regarding the attempt at robbery in Bafana House?

There was never any conspiracy in the mind of these four accused to break into the Bafans' house and steal. Criminal conspiracy in this case, if anyone

I was to say that no. 1. (Jakkal) and no. 2. (Dilip Sutar) were among the two. Therefore, this Bafna case belongs to the family of Joshi and Abhyankar.

Associating it with murder is wrong. Such a connection cannot be made. And holding all four accused responsible in this Bafna case is wrong.

The circumstance of an attempt to commit robbery in Bafana's house does not help the prosecution establish criminal

Conspiracy on the part of all four accused persons. Because there was no such conspiracy at all to commit robbery.

in Bafana's house.

Pune Crime News, Part Five: Apologising Witness 4

Abhyankar case: Pune Crime News

1st December

Mass murder of the Abhyankar family in 1976 (Shulk Paksha-Dashmi) between 8 and 10 PM at the corner of Bhandarkar Road in Pune.

A total of five people were killed in the 'Smuti' bungalow. That too without shedding a single drop of blood. Mr. Gajanan Abhyankar's father, Kashinath Shastri,

Elderly mother Indirabai, Gajanan Rao's son Dhananjay, daughter Kumari Jai, and maid Sakhubai were killed in a mass murder.

Three members of the Joshi family were murdered in the same manner as one month ago. The same attack was made at Abhyankar's house on December 1.

It happened on the night of 1976. The killers did not leave any clues behind. Fire inside and outside the house after the murder is richly aromatic.

Liquids, perfumes, etc. were sprinkled. His mirror was coming out of the road in the distance. This perfumed liquid was sprayed by killers. He is a police dog.

Just to fool the team.

Pune Crime News, Part Five: Apologising Witness 4

On December 1, 1976, around 8 p.m., Shri G.K. Abhyankar and his wife, Mrs. Both Hirabai, went to their friend's house for dinner.

was He returned home around 11:00 p.m. Then they found all five people in the house unconscious. Kanya Jai is lying naked.

appeared Dr. After examination by a doctor named Deshpande, all five people were found to be dead. The news about this incident appeared in newspapers.

It has been reported that only some jewellery was stolen. Doctor Dhananjay's 'stethoscope' was where it belonged in the cupboard. The killers also touched it.

No. Also, they did not steal the silver idol of Saraswati from the Deoghars. By putting a handful of kunku around the idol, as if to worship the goddess

The real killers were given the pretext of human sacrifice. Not by jackals and congregations. This is multiple murders, mass murder, and three persons from the Joshi family.

The murder took place on Shuklapaksha Dashami. This act and this attack were definitely pre-planned; the incident itself was so extraordinary and terrifying that it shocked the whole of Pune.

The city was shaken. As panic occurs when an earthquake occurs, a great panic spreads in the city of Pune.

All the police officers were speechless.

Pune Crime News, Part Five: Apologising Witness 4

Who was the one who slaughtered eight people in total without shedding a single drop of blood (3+5)? What caused this horror?

Murderers? Here, I want to make a special mention.

The murder was not just for the purpose of stealing some jewels. These horrible murders created great panic among the citizens of Pune.

In particular, the purpose was to induce the Brahmin congregation to leave the city of Pune. Only for jewellery theft

Such a tax act does not occur, and such a premeditated attack does not occur.

The second important thing to mention is that after Joshi-Abhyankar's (multiple murders) murders, police teams were investigating everywhere continuously for five months.

Many taxi drivers and autorickshaw pullers were thoroughly checked. During this period, the prosecution did not have a single eyewitness.

No. Joshi-Abhyankar mass murder case when first District Judge Shri. Not a single eye when standing in Waikar's court.

The witness (direct evidence) could not be placed before the court. Because any of these four accused entered the house of Joshi or Abhyankar

had not seen No similar evidence came before the court. Only circumstantial evidence was placed before the court.

This (circumstantial evidence) is the murder of Prakash Hegde a year ago, the attempted robbery of the Bafans' house, and four months later.

The murder of Anil Gokhale, the youth, in such a situation, District Judge Shri. Criminal Conspiracy Indian Penal on all four accused by Waikar

Code 120-B refused to charge.

Pune Crime News, Part Five: Apologising Witness 4

Then the prosecution approached the Bombay High Court. ie., revision application A criminal revision application was filed.

Even during the hearing of that application, in the court of Justice Dighe, any direct evidence means an eyewitness.

Witnesses to the prosecution could not be produced before the court.

Pune Crime News, Part Five: Apology Witness 3

Iyer of Pune for accused numbers 3 and 4: Pune Crime News

On behalf of accused no. 3 and 4, the Iyer lawyer of Pune said,

My Lord, There is nothing in the record to show that Jakkal and Sutar or Shantaram Jagtap and

Munnavar Shah entered Joshi's house or Abhyankar's house'.

No similar evidence is available in the High Court. Despite this, the prosecution insisted on all four accused

(Criminal Conspiracy Section 120-B, I.P. Code) was charged. and Sessions at Pune in the Joshi-Abhyankar murder case

Sent back to court. Pune Sessions Court Judge Shri. After many days after witness evidence was opened in Bapat's court, the police fabricated one.

The witness produced is Nagesh Kadape, a scooter and motorcycle repairer, who said that all four accused were arrested at 9 p.m. near Mandarkar Road.

had seen Out of which number (1), Rajendra Jakkal asked this Kadape for a box of matches to light a cigarette, and after lighting the stick

In the light of that stick, he saw the face of Jakkal. How false this Lonkadhi thap is is clear from the facts mentioned earlier. because

Initially Mr. This hard evidence was not available at the time of the revision application in the District Court and later in the Bombay High Court. (No Direct

Evidence: The statement that there is no direct evidence was made before the court. Now what evidence about the mass murder of the Abhyankar family came before the court?

Check it out:

Testimony of Ashtekar Sarafa: Accused No. 1 Rajendra Jakkal allegedly sold gold bars to Ashtekar Sarafa. Jakkal said this is gold.

A goldsmith had stolen the gold ornaments from Abhyankara's house, melted them, and gave them to him. 5500 he got by selling it.

Such a complete false statement Ashtekar Sarafa made. It was a lie. Because in this way, if the accused, Rajendra Jakkal, goes to their shop and steals the gold

Had he sold it, he would have been caught red-handed. Nothing like that happened. Ashtekar Saraf is a famous goldsmith in Pune. His gold

A large jewellery store is located on Lakshmi Road, Pune. How will Rajendra Jakkal go into that trust? In the same village, terrible mass murders were committed.

It is a psychological fact that persistent criminals never sell stolen goods in villages. The true reality is that this testimony of Ashtekar bullion shop

It was a concocted story made up by the police. Jakkal Ha College Kumar Ashtekar bullion shop anytime to sell gold bars, etc.

had not gone. Because the murder of five members of the Abhyankar family was not done with the intention of stealing.

(The motive for the multiple murders was not the theft of ornaments.)

Pune Crime News, Part Five: Witness of Apology

Witness evidence: Pune crime news

Marriage of Sarafa's House:

When Sonar-Saraf Mandali testified in court, the accused's lawyer asked them some questions.

When the police officials sent a list of jewels stolen from Abhyankar's house,

How did you take the jewellery from the accused?' 'Did you inform the excise officials that you bought the timber?' In answering these questions,

Sonar clapped and said:

This transaction was not a sale of gold. This was a purchase for the family!' - talking about buying a log for the marriage of a daughter or nephew.

An important point in this evidence is a circular letter issued by the Commissioner of Police to the Saraf organisation after that gruesome mass murder.

It was sent, and it was indicated that whoever comes to the goldsmith's shop to sell isam gold ornaments or goods, wood, etc., his name

And the address should be written down, and the information should be immediately reported to the police station' as per the sheet.

Saraf could have informed the police about the person, and the criminal would have been caught red-handed in that shop. Such coloured hands

No one was caught red-handed. None of the goldsmiths informed the police officers in this way. Because the testimony of goldsmiths is completely

was 'fake/fake'. Another reason is that the criminals, who so cleanly, without shedding a drop of blood, killed five people and escaped in the city of Pune itself.

It is highly unlikely that anyone would step into a goldsmith's shop and sell gold bars of stolen jewellery in Pune itself.

Because these kinds of murderers will be caught, the police will be on their trail, and detectives will be around the goldsmith's shop.

There is always a fear that the police soldiers will be on the lookout. Then, Jakkal entrusted 'Ashtekar Saraf' to Pune.

The gold bar sold in the shop is just a pickle tap. This circumstantial evidence proves the murder of five people.

do not happen.

Also visit: https://www.postboxlive.com.

respectively

Prabhakar Pradhan, Advocate

Research, Dissertation Writing—Vaibhav Jagtap

Website : https://postboxindia.com

Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/indiapostbox

Instagram : http://www.Instagram.com/indiapostbox